Home iOS Apple tramples on security in the name of convenience

Apple tramples on security in the name of convenience


Apple plans with iOS 14.5 to allow masked enterprise employees to access their iPhones if they are also wearing an Apple Watch (running WatchOS 7.4), that is unlocked. Heads up: This is a quintessential convenience vs. security trade-off from Apple, and if you don’t insist that workers refrain from using the feature, corporate security will suffer.

In short, it will be make it much easier for corporate spies and cyberthieves to snag your company’s intellectual property, which is being created, stored, and shipped within smartphones today at a far greater rate than 2019 — aka the pre-COVID-19 times.

Apple has refused to let this convenience do anything other than opening the phone (which is bad enough). And it will not allow the feature to bypass facial ID authentication for the AppleCard, ApplePay or any third-party app (such as banks and investment firms) that have embraced Face ID. That tells you pretty much all you need to know about how much of a security corner-cutter this move is.

Let’s drill into what Apple has done and give credit where it’s due. As a security move, it’s horrible — and that should be the main concern of enterprise IT since it endangers ultra-sensitive corporate data. That said, it’s a pretty impressive dose of convenience.

First, this is absolutely pandemic-based, as the unlock process starts by scanning for the existence of someone wearing a mask. Once it determines that, it allows the phone to be unlocked if there’s an unlocked Apple Watch nearby. All it’s really doing is replacing a PIN entry on the phone with a previous PIN entry on the watch. And that can prove helpful.

How helpful and — to the point — how much more convenient? It’s a better idea, but I’m not so sure it’s much more than a gimmick. Most iPhone users still have to enter their iPhone PIN many times a day. For most of us, it’s now muscle memory and barely takes a second. If it’s only saving a second or two of time, I’m not convinced it’s worth the effort.

As noted above, the Apple Watch-iPhone authentication combo — which sort of plays off Unix’s trusted host concept, in that it’s saying, “If you’ve already authenticated yourself on the Watch, I’ll trust you” — doesn’t work with any sensitive third-party app that uses Apple’s facial recognition for authentication. We’re talking a one-trick pony here, something that can only open the iPhone and then only if it detects a mask. This might be more useful in the winter when wearing gloves and a ski-mask over a Covid mask, where finger access is a hassle.

As for security, this convenience gambit is going to make life a lot easier for bad guys. Let’s say someone steals one of your employee’s phone and watch, perhaps when they fall asleep on the subway or train. Or perhaps simply during a mugging at knifepoint.

Copyright © 2021 IDG Communications, Inc.


  1. After study a couple of of the weblog posts in your website now, and I truly like your way of blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark web site record and will be checking back soon. Pls check out my site as properly and let me know what you think.

  2. dosage hydroxychloroquine for humans

    Apple tramples on security in the name of convenience | Software Tool Apps

  3. michigan governor bans hydroxychloroquine

    wealthy adenosine triphosphate historic

  4. I do agree with all the ideas you have presented in your post. They’re very convincing and will certainly work. Still, the posts are very short for novices. Could you please extend them a bit from next time? Thanks for the post.

  5. Thank you for every other great article. Where else may just anyone get that type of info in such an ideal approach of writing? I have a presentation next week, and I am on the look for such info.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here